Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-10980XE

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core i9-10980XE

18 Cores36 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2019
Core family
·······

Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-10980XE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-10980XE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-10980XE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $783 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
  • Delivers 288.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-10980XE.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,309).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Core i9-10980XE

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
  • 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10980XE better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Core i9-10980XE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 50% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 28.6% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10980XE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10980XE is the stronger fit. You are getting 50% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10980XE is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-10980XE comes in 399.5% more expensive on MSRP at $979 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 288.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 32.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-10980XE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core i9-10980XE

The Core i9-10980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 32,187 points. Launch price was $979.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10980XE offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Core i9-10980XE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10980XE — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980XE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10980XE uses Cascade Lake-X (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-10980XE's 32,187 — a 25% lead for the Core i9-10980XE. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 24,309 (40% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,242, a 63.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 16,275 (35.2% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980XE.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-10980XE
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
18 / 36+80%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
24.75 MB (total)+24%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Cascade Lake-X (2019)
PassMark
25,029
32,187+29%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
24,309+50%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+94%
1,242
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
16,275+43%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10980XE uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10980XE — the Core i5-13400F supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10980XE supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Core i9-10980XE). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Core i9-10980XE) — the Core i9-10980XE offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and X299 (Core i9-10980XE).

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-10980XE
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
256 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-10980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Core i9-10980XE). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-10980XE
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i9-10980XE came in at $979. On launch pricing ($196 vs $979), Core i5-13400F was $783 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 32.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-10980XE — making the Core i5-13400F the 118.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-10980XE
MSRP
$196-80%
$979
Performance per Dollar
127.7+288%
32.9
Release Date
2023
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.