
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i9-11900F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+13.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-11900F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-11900F
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,052 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i9-11900F
2021Why buy it
- ✅+13.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-11900F.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,052 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-11900F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 435 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i9-11900F

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F
The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-11900F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-11900F uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-11900F's 22,052 — a 12.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+13% | 22,052 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-11900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i9-11900F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













