
Core i5-13400F

Core i9-13900KS
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-13900KS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-13900KS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-13900KS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Costs $503 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β Delivers 47.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13900KS.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 40,998).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900KS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +33.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +80% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 86.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KS better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-13900KS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-13900KS offers 24 cores / 32 threads β the Core i9-13900KS has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS β a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-13900KS's 60,543 β a 83% lead for the Core i9-13900KS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 40,998 (86.7% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,407 vs 3,123, a 25.9% lead for the Core i9-13900KS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 21,421 (61% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 24 / 32+140% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.8 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+80% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 60,543+142% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 40,998+153% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 3,123+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 21,421+88% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KS β the Core i9-13900KS supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900KS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Core i9-13900KS). The Core i9-13900KS includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i9-13900KS came in at $699. On launch pricing ($196 vs $699), Core i5-13400F was $503 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 86.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900KS β making the Core i5-13400F the 38.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-72% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+47% | 86.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















