PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Costs $1,003 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 551.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Costs $1,003 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 551.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-7920X?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.5% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.5% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $1,003 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 551.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i9-7920X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	171 FPS	163 FPS
medium	158 FPS	142 FPS
high	132 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	140 FPS
medium	123 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	76 FPS
medium	74 FPS	70 FPS
high	59 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-7920X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	545 FPS	352 FPS
medium	464 FPS	300 FPS
high	389 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	315 FPS
medium	403 FPS	274 FPS
high	345 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	227 FPS
medium	247 FPS	201 FPS
high	231 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	162 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-7920X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	530 FPS	560 FPS
medium	449 FPS	468 FPS
high	415 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	366 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	507 FPS
medium	422 FPS	431 FPS
high	382 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	334 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	390 FPS
medium	331 FPS	322 FPS
high	296 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	231 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-7920X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
1080p
low	626 FPS	588 FPS
medium	626 FPS	588 FPS
high	626 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	588 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	588 FPS
medium	626 FPS	588 FPS
high	598 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	502 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	531 FPS
medium	492 FPS	480 FPS
high	439 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	366 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-7920X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i9-7920X

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-7920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-7920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-7920X's 23,508 — a 6.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+5%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+21%	16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,029+6%	23,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-7920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i9-7920X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-7920X
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i9-7920X debuted at $1199. On MSRP ($196 vs $1199), the Core i5-13400F is $1003 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-7920X — making the Core i5-13400F the 146.8% better value option.