Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-9980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2019

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +79.2% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9980HK.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i9-9980HK

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-9980HK?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-9980HK is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 79.2% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 79.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 79.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i9-9980HK is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low171 FPS271 FPS
medium158 FPS246 FPS
high132 FPS207 FPS
ultra112 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS235 FPS
medium123 FPS193 FPS
high99 FPS158 FPS
ultra84 FPS139 FPS
4K
low81 FPS165 FPS
medium74 FPS137 FPS
high59 FPS106 FPS
ultra46 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low545 FPS349 FPS
medium464 FPS349 FPS
high389 FPS349 FPS
ultra356 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS349 FPS
medium403 FPS349 FPS
high345 FPS349 FPS
ultra301 FPS323 FPS
4K
low280 FPS349 FPS
medium247 FPS310 FPS
high231 FPS291 FPS
ultra204 FPS245 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low530 FPS349 FPS
medium449 FPS349 FPS
high415 FPS349 FPS
ultra375 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS349 FPS
medium422 FPS349 FPS
high382 FPS349 FPS
ultra343 FPS349 FPS
4K
low393 FPS349 FPS
medium331 FPS349 FPS
high296 FPS349 FPS
ultra246 FPS322 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
1080p
low626 FPS349 FPS
medium626 FPS349 FPS
high626 FPS349 FPS
ultra626 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS349 FPS
medium626 FPS349 FPS
high598 FPS349 FPS
ultra521 FPS349 FPS
4K
low535 FPS349 FPS
medium492 FPS349 FPS
high439 FPS349 FPS
ultra382 FPS349 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i9-9980HK

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core i9-9980HK

The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-9980HK offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9980HK uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-9980HK's 13,966 — a 56.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark
25,029+79%
13,966
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9980HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
Socket
LGA1700
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i9-9980HK). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i9-9980HK
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming