
Core i5-13400F

Core i9-9980XE
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-9980XE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-9980XE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-9980XE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+65% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $1,783 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,979 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 767.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,979 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 22,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i9-9980XE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+35.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,459 vs 2,407).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,979 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-9980XE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core i9-9980XE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-9980XE
The Core i9-9980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 29,127 points. Launch price was $1,979.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-9980XE offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Core i9-9980XE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9980XE — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9980XE uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-9980XE's 29,127 — a 15.1% lead for the Core i9-9980XE. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 22,000 (30.3% advantage for the Core i9-9980XE). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,459, a 49% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,177 (6.5% advantage for the Core i9-9980XE). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 18 / 36+80% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+24% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 29,127+16% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 22,000+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+65% | 1,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 12,177+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9980XE uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9980XE — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Core i9-9980XE). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 44 (Core i9-9980XE) — the Core i9-9980XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and X299 (Core i9-9980XE).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 44+120% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9980XE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-9980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i9-9980XE targets HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i9-9980XE rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i9-9980XE came in at $1979. On launch pricing ($196 vs $1979), Core i5-13400F was $1783 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-9980XE — making the Core i5-13400F the 158.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-90% | $1979 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+769% | 14.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















