PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core M-5Y10a FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core M-5Y10a: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +363.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1783.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core M-5Y10a can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core M-5Y10a

2014

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 5300, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core M-5Y10a?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 363.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1213.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 363.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1213.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $85 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 363.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1783.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1234, 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Core M-5Y10a Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core M-5Y10a

The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core M-5Y10a offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a — a 78.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core M-5Y10a uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core M-5Y10a's 1,905 — a 171.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core M-5Y10a
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+400%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+130%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+213%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+400%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	25,029+1214%	1,905
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core M-5Y10a uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Core M-5Y10a — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 12 (Core M-5Y10a) — the Core i5-13400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core M-5Y10a
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%	LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+1100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+67%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core M-5Y10a includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core M-5Y10a
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 5300
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core M-5Y10a came in at $281. On launch pricing ($196 vs $281), Core i5-13400F was $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y10a — making the Core i5-13400F the 179.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core M-5Y10a
MSRP	$196-30%	$281
Performance per Dollar	127.7+1778%	6.8
Release Date	2023	2014

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Core M-5Y10a on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.