Core i5-13400F vs Core m3-7Y30

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016

Core i5-13400F vs Core m3-7Y30 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core m3-7Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core m3-7Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +286.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $85 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1384.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • βœ…Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • ❌1344.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 4.5W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core m3-7Y30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core m3-7Y30

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (645 vs 16,211).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core m3-7Y30?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 286.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2413.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 935.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 286.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2413.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $85 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 286.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1384.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1515, 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Core m3-7Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads β€” the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 β€” a 55.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 β€” a 164.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 645 (184.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,407 vs 768, a 103.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 1,481 (154% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore m3-7Y30
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+400%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+77%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+150%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+400%
4 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Kaby Lake (2016βˆ’2019)
PassMark
25,029+935%
2,418
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211+2413%
645
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+213%
768
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+670%
1,481
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 β€” the Core i5-13400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β€” 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) β€” the Core i5-13400F offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30).

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore m3-7Y30
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157%
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+1100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20+100%
10
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore m3-7Y30
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
β€”
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Gaming
Ultra-portable
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core m3-7Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($196 vs $281), Core i5-13400F was $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y30 β€” making the Core i5-13400F the 174.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore m3-7Y30
MSRP
$196-30%
$281
Performance per Dollar
127.7+1385%
8.6
Release Date
2023
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.