Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 125U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 125U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +36.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 125U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core Ultra 5 125U

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (17,152 vs 25,029).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core Ultra 5 125U?
    Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 36.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 45.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 36.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 45.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 36.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Ultra 5 125U is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    1080p
    low171 FPS181 FPS
    medium158 FPS145 FPS
    high132 FPS117 FPS
    ultra112 FPS96 FPS
    1440p
    low143 FPS147 FPS
    medium123 FPS116 FPS
    high99 FPS93 FPS
    ultra84 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low81 FPS79 FPS
    medium74 FPS67 FPS
    high59 FPS54 FPS
    ultra46 FPS42 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    1080p
    low545 FPS181 FPS
    medium464 FPS153 FPS
    high389 FPS140 FPS
    ultra356 FPS123 FPS
    1440p
    low458 FPS160 FPS
    medium403 FPS139 FPS
    high345 FPS129 FPS
    ultra301 FPS111 FPS
    4K
    low280 FPS131 FPS
    medium247 FPS117 FPS
    high231 FPS110 FPS
    ultra204 FPS95 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    1080p
    low530 FPS429 FPS
    medium449 FPS429 FPS
    high415 FPS429 FPS
    ultra375 FPS429 FPS
    1440p
    low490 FPS429 FPS
    medium422 FPS429 FPS
    high382 FPS429 FPS
    ultra343 FPS413 FPS
    4K
    low393 FPS429 FPS
    medium331 FPS380 FPS
    high296 FPS331 FPS
    ultra246 FPS265 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    1080p
    low626 FPS429 FPS
    medium626 FPS429 FPS
    high626 FPS429 FPS
    ultra626 FPS429 FPS
    1440p
    low626 FPS429 FPS
    medium626 FPS429 FPS
    high598 FPS429 FPS
    ultra521 FPS429 FPS
    4K
    low535 FPS429 FPS
    medium492 FPS429 FPS
    high439 FPS417 FPS
    ultra382 FPS364 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 125U

    Intel

    Core i5-13400F

    The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 125U

    The Core Ultra 5 125U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,152 points. Launch price was $363.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 125U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125U — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 125U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 125U's 17,152 — a 37.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 125U.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    Cores / Threads
    10 / 16
    12 / 14+20%
    Boost Clock
    4.6 GHz+7%
    4.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.5 GHz+92%
    1.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    20 MB (total)+67%
    12 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1.25 MB (per core)
    2 MB (per core)+60%
    Process
    Intel 7 nm
    7 nm
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
    Meteor Lake-P (2023)
    PassMark
    25,029+46%
    17,152
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    16,211
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,407
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    11,408
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 125U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    Socket
    LGA1700
    FCBGA2049
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 125U). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 125U
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Gaming