PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core Ultra 5 228V?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 37.5% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 63.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 47.6% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.5% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 63.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $295 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.5% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 122.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 228V Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	171 FPS	180 FPS
medium	158 FPS	145 FPS
high	132 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	148 FPS
medium	123 FPS	117 FPS
high	99 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	74 FPS	71 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	545 FPS	212 FPS
medium	464 FPS	176 FPS
high	389 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	181 FPS
medium	403 FPS	154 FPS
high	345 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	137 FPS
medium	247 FPS	122 FPS
high	231 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	100 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	530 FPS	424 FPS
medium	449 FPS	424 FPS
high	415 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	424 FPS
medium	422 FPS	424 FPS
high	382 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	424 FPS
medium	331 FPS	384 FPS
high	296 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 228V

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	626 FPS	424 FPS
medium	626 FPS	424 FPS
high	626 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	424 FPS
medium	626 FPS	424 FPS
high	598 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	424 FPS
medium	492 FPS	424 FPS
high	439 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	408 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 228V

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 38.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 9,932 (48% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,585, a 7.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,053 (12.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)+100%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	25,029+48%	16,955
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+63%	9,932
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,585+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+13%	10,053

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) — the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+500%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+150%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 228V
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Arc 130V
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 228V debuted at $295. On MSRP ($196 vs $295), the Core i5-13400F is $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 228V — making the Core i5-13400F the 75.8% better value option.