
Core i5-13400F

Core Ultra 5 245
Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 245 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 245 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Costs $123 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 245.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (25,029 vs 40,165).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- β62.8% HIGHER MSRP$319 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 245 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245 offers 14 cores / 14 threads β the Core Ultra 5 245 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 β a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 β a 46.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 14+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 40,165+60% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 β the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core Ultra 5 245 came in at $319. On launch pricing ($196 vs $319), Core i5-13400F was $123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 β making the Core i5-13400F the 1.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-39% | $319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+1% | 125.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















