Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 245

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 245

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $123 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 245.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 40,165).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 245

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 62.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $319 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 245 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 29.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 60.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245 is the better fit. You are getting 60.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 245 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 245 is 62.8% more expensive on MSRP at $319 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 1.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 125.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 245 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 10/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
1080p
low171 FPS278 FPS
medium158 FPS263 FPS
high132 FPS222 FPS
ultra112 FPS189 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS230 FPS
medium123 FPS194 FPS
high99 FPS158 FPS
ultra84 FPS138 FPS
4K
low81 FPS153 FPS
medium74 FPS128 FPS
high59 FPS100 FPS
ultra46 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
1080p
low545 FPS668 FPS
medium464 FPS564 FPS
high389 FPS469 FPS
ultra356 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS579 FPS
medium403 FPS509 FPS
high345 FPS426 FPS
ultra301 FPS369 FPS
4K
low280 FPS342 FPS
medium247 FPS306 FPS
high231 FPS291 FPS
ultra204 FPS256 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
1080p
low530 FPS845 FPS
medium449 FPS689 FPS
high415 FPS613 FPS
ultra375 FPS525 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS730 FPS
medium422 FPS598 FPS
high382 FPS519 FPS
ultra343 FPS441 FPS
4K
low393 FPS505 FPS
medium331 FPS425 FPS
high296 FPS383 FPS
ultra246 FPS324 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
1080p
low626 FPS1004 FPS
medium626 FPS956 FPS
high626 FPS834 FPS
ultra626 FPS758 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS865 FPS
medium626 FPS764 FPS
high598 FPS663 FPS
ultra521 FPS589 FPS
4K
low535 FPS585 FPS
medium492 FPS525 FPS
high439 FPS472 FPS
ultra382 FPS417 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 245

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 245

The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245 offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 46.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
14 / 14+40%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+140%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
25,029
40,165+60%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
6400+127900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+78643100%
256
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245 debuted at $319. On MSRP ($196 vs $319), the Core i5-13400F is $123 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core i5-13400F the 1.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 245
MSRP
$196-39%
$319
Performance per Dollar
127.7+1%
125.9
Release Date
2023
2025