PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 265K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 36,309).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 190.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 265K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 265K

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Delivers 49.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 190.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 64EU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
57.7% HIGHER MSRP
$309 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 265K better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 265K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 29.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 124% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 134.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 265K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 265K is the stronger fit. You are getting 124% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 265K is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 7 265K comes in 57.7% more expensive on MSRP at $309 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 49.0% better value on MSRP (190.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 265K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 7 265K

The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265K offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265K uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 7 265K's 58,789 — a 80.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 36,309 (76.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,283, a 30.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 22,293 (64.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 7 265K
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	20 / 20+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.5 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+140%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	25,029	58,789+135%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	36,309+124%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	3,283+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	22,293+95%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265K uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265K — the Core Ultra 7 265K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265K supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and LGA1851 (Core Ultra 7 265K).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 7 265K
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 7 265K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265K includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 7 265K
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Arc Graphics 64EU
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core Ultra 7 265K came in at $309. On launch pricing ($196 vs $309), Core i5-13400F was $113 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 190.3 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265K — making the Core Ultra 7 265K the 39.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP	$196-37%	$309
Performance per Dollar	127.7	190.3+49%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 7 265K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.