Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265KF

20 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2024
Core Ultra family
·······

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $183 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 265KF.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 35,315).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 154.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Core Ultra 7 265KF

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Delivers 21.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 154.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($379 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 93.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $379 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 265KF better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 7 265KF is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 29.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 117.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 134.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 265KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 265KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 117.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 265KF is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 7 265KF comes in 93.4% more expensive on MSRP at $379 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.3% better value on MSRP (154.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265KF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265KF

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265KF has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 7 265KF's 58,690 — a 80.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 35,315 (74.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,055, a 23.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 20,373 (56.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265KF.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 265KF
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
20 / 20+100%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.5 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+140%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
25,029
58,690+134%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
35,315+118%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
3,055+27%
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
20,373+79%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265KF — the Core Ultra 7 265KF supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) — the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF).

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 265KF
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20
24+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Core Ultra 7 265KF). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 265KF
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF came in at $379. On launch pricing ($196 vs $379), Core i5-13400F was $183 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 154.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265KF — making the Core Ultra 7 265KF the 19.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP
$196-48%
$379
Performance per Dollar
127.7
154.9+21%
Release Date
2023
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.