Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4245P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4245P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4245P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

31,135

+24.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4245P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4245P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+35.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4245P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4245P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4245P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while EPYC 4245P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4245P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 16,211).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4245P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4245P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 35.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4245P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4245P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 35.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4245P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4245P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4245P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P — a 16% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4245P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 4245P's 31,135 — a 21.7% lead for the EPYC 4245P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 12,000 (29.9% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,347, a 32.7% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 14,616 (24.7% advantage for the EPYC 4245P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4245P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	25,029	31,135+24%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+35%	12,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	3,347+39%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	14,616+28%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4245P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P — the EPYC 4245P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4245P supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (EPYC 4245P) — the EPYC 4245P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4245P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4245P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 4245P). The EPYC 4245P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4245P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Entry-level Server / Workstation