Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4464P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 4464P

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

47,185

+88.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4464P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 47,185).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4464P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 110.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

EPYC 4464P

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4464P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4464P across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 47,185).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4464P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 110.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4464P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4464P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4464P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.8% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4464P is the better fit. You are getting 88.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4464P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 4464P is 118.9% more expensive on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 16.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 110.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4464P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 4464P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
1080p
low	171 FPS	252 FPS
medium	158 FPS	231 FPS
high	132 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	222 FPS
medium	123 FPS	183 FPS
high	99 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	154 FPS
medium	74 FPS	127 FPS
high	59 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 4464P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
1080p
low	545 FPS	585 FPS
medium	464 FPS	493 FPS
high	389 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	341 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	503 FPS
medium	403 FPS	444 FPS
high	345 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	297 FPS
medium	247 FPS	268 FPS
high	231 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 4464P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
1080p
low	530 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	449 FPS	1114 FPS
high	415 FPS	1037 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	938 FPS
medium	422 FPS	832 FPS
high	382 FPS	751 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	650 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	573 FPS
medium	331 FPS	492 FPS
high	296 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	373 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 4464P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
1080p
low	626 FPS	1180 FPS
medium	626 FPS	1015 FPS
high	626 FPS	942 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	828 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	1000 FPS
medium	626 FPS	873 FPS
high	598 FPS	748 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	634 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	678 FPS
medium	492 FPS	594 FPS
high	439 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 4464P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 4464P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 4464P

The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4464P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 4464P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P — a 16% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4464P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 4464P's 47,185 — a 61.4% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029	47,185+89%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4464P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 5200 on the EPYC 4464P — the EPYC 4464P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4464P) — the EPYC 4464P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	5200+103900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+157286300%	128
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4464P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4464P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4464P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the EPYC 4464P debuted at $429. On MSRP ($196 vs $429), the Core i5-13400F is $233 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 110.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 4464P — making the Core i5-13400F the 14.9% better value option.