Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4484PX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4484PX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

50,547

+102.0%

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4484PX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4484PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $403 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4484PX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4484PX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4484PX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4484PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 41.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4484PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 51.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4484PX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4484PX comes in 205.6% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 41.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 51.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 84.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4484PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4484PX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4484PX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 4484PX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX — a 19.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4484PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 4484PX's 50,547 — a 67.5% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 24,500 (40.7% advantage for the EPYC 4484PX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,950, a 20.3% lead for the EPYC 4484PX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 17,500 (42.1% advantage for the EPYC 4484PX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4484PX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.6 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.4 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+540%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029	50,547+102%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	24,500+51%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,950+23%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	17,500+53%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4484PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX — the EPYC 4484PX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4484PX) — the EPYC 4484PX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4484PX
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4484PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4484PX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation / Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the EPYC 4484PX came in at $599. On launch pricing ($196 vs $599), Core i5-13400F was $403 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4484PX — making the Core i5-13400F the 40.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4484PX
MSRP	$196-67%	$599
Performance per Dollar	127.7+51%	84.4
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4484PX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.