Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4565P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4565P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

64,068

+156.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4565P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4565P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,534 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅Delivers 444.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4565P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 64,068).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4565P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4565P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4565P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4565P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 32.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4565P is the stronger fit. You are getting 156% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4565P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4565P comes in 1292.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 444.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 23.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4565P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 4565P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4565P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 4565P has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P — a 21.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4565P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 4565P's 64,068 — a 87.6% lead for the EPYC 4565P. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4565P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.7 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.3 GHz+72%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+220%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	25,029	64,068+156%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4565P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 5600 on the EPYC 4565P — the EPYC 4565P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4565P) — the EPYC 4565P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AM5 (EPYC 4565P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4565P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4565P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4565P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the EPYC 4565P came in at $2730. On launch pricing ($196 vs $2730), Core i5-13400F was $2534 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 23.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 4565P — making the Core i5-13400F the 137.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 4565P
MSRP	$196-93%	$2730
Performance per Dollar	127.7+443%	23.5
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4565P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.