Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 73F3

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

46,103

+84.2%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,325 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 73F3.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 73F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 46,103).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 73F3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,325 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 73F3.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 73F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 46,103).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 73F3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 73F3 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 73F3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 73F3 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the better fit. You are getting 84.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 73F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 73F3 is 1696.4% more expensive on MSRP at $3,521 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 875.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 73F3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
1080p
low	171 FPS	200 FPS
medium	158 FPS	159 FPS
high	132 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	166 FPS
medium	123 FPS	128 FPS
high	99 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	74 FPS
medium	74 FPS	61 FPS
high	59 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 73F3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
1080p
low	545 FPS	510 FPS
medium	464 FPS	446 FPS
high	389 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	290 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	418 FPS
medium	403 FPS	375 FPS
high	345 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	257 FPS
medium	247 FPS	235 FPS
high	231 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	171 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 73F3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
1080p
low	530 FPS	979 FPS
medium	449 FPS	819 FPS
high	415 FPS	760 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	678 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	675 FPS
medium	422 FPS	564 FPS
high	382 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	453 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	482 FPS
medium	331 FPS	382 FPS
high	296 FPS	338 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	274 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 73F3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
1080p
low	626 FPS	1146 FPS
medium	626 FPS	1015 FPS
high	626 FPS	873 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	758 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	842 FPS
medium	626 FPS	733 FPS
high	598 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	539 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	608 FPS
medium	492 FPS	542 FPS
high	439 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	407 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 73F3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 73F3

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 73F3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 59.3% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+1180%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	25,029	46,103+84%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the EPYC 73F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 73F3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 73F3
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the EPYC 73F3 debuted at $3521. On MSRP ($196 vs $3521), the Core i5-13400F is $3325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the Core i5-13400F the 162.8% better value option.