Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7443P

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7443P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

56,808

+127.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7443P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7443P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,141 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
✅Delivers 200.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 42.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7443P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7443P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 56,808).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7443P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7443P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7443P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7443P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7443P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7443P is the stronger fit. You are getting 127% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7443P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7443P comes in 582.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,337 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 200.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 42.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7443P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 7443P

The EPYC 7443P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,808 points. Launch price was $1,337.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7443P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7443P has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443P — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.85 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7443P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 7443P's 56,808 — a 77.7% lead for the EPYC 7443P. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7443P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	24 / 48+140%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.85 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+540%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	25,029	56,808+127%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7443P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7443P — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7443P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7443P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7443P) — the EPYC 7443P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP3 (EPYC 7443P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7443P
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 7443P rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7443P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the EPYC 7443P came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($196 vs $1337), Core i5-13400F was $1141 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 42.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 7443P — making the Core i5-13400F the 100.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7443P
MSRP	$196-85%	$1337
Performance per Dollar	127.7+200%	42.5
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search EPYC 7443P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.