Core i5-13400F
EPYC 7663
Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7663 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7663 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7663: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+75.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $6,170 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 889.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7663, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7663
2021Why buy it
- ✅+8.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,370 vs 2,407).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than EPYC 7663?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7663 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
EPYC 7663
The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7663 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 7663 has 46 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7663 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 7663's 82,120 — a 106.6% lead for the EPYC 7663. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,370, a 54.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,380 (8.2% advantage for the EPYC 7663). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7663.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 7663 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 56 / 112+460% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+31% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1180% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 82,120+228% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+76% | 1,370 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 12,380+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7663 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7663 — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7663 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7663). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7663) — the EPYC 7663 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP3 (EPYC 7663).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 7663 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7663). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 7663 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the EPYC 7663 came in at $6366. On launch pricing ($196 vs $6366), Core i5-13400F was $6170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7663 — making the Core i5-13400F the 163.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | EPYC 7663 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-97% | $6366 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+890% | 12.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400F and EPYC 7663
