Core i5-13400F vs FX-9800P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

FX-9800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+917.4%

2,460

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +260.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 678.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-9800P.

Trade-offs

❌
30.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +260.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 678.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-9800P.

Why buy it

✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
30.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than FX-9800P?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 260.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 917.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 260.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 917.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is 30.7% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it gives you a 260.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 678.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP4, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

FX-9800P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
1080p
low	171 FPS	62 FPS
medium	158 FPS	62 FPS
high	132 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	62 FPS
medium	123 FPS	62 FPS
high	99 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	62 FPS
medium	74 FPS	56 FPS
high	59 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open FX-9800P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
1080p
low	545 FPS	62 FPS
medium	464 FPS	62 FPS
high	389 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	62 FPS
medium	403 FPS	62 FPS
high	345 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	62 FPS
medium	247 FPS	62 FPS
high	231 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	53 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open FX-9800P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
1080p
low	530 FPS	62 FPS
medium	449 FPS	62 FPS
high	415 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	62 FPS
medium	422 FPS	62 FPS
high	382 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	62 FPS
medium	331 FPS	62 FPS
high	296 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	62 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open FX-9800P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
1080p
low	626 FPS	62 FPS
medium	626 FPS	62 FPS
high	626 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	62 FPS
medium	626 FPS	62 FPS
high	598 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	62 FPS
medium	492 FPS	62 FPS
high	439 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	62 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open FX-9800P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and FX-9800P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the FX-9800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the FX-9800P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the FX-9800P's 2,460 — a 164.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+150%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per module)
Process	Intel 7 nm-75%	28 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	25,029+917%	2,460
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-9800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
Socket	LGA1700	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (FX-9800P). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	FX-9800P
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the FX-9800P debuted at $150. On MSRP ($196 vs $150), the FX-9800P is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the FX-9800P — making the Core i5-13400F the 154.5% better value option.