
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

M3 Pro 11-Core
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Pro 11-Core.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,861 vs 25,029).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Pro 11-Core.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,861 vs 25,029).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than M3 Pro 11-Core?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and M3 Pro 11-Core

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the M3 Pro 11-Core offers 11 cores / 11 threads β the M3 Pro 11-Core has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core β a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the M3 Pro 11-Core's 24,861 β a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 11 / 11+10% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+13% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.748 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | β |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 24,861 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Pro 11-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (M3 Pro 11-Core). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













