Core i5-13400F vs N250

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

N250

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +136.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N250.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while N250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

N250

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (4,773 vs 25,029).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-13400F better than N250?
    Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 136.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 424.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 136.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 424.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 136.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    N250 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-13400FN250
    1080p
    low171 FPS119 FPS
    medium158 FPS119 FPS
    high132 FPS113 FPS
    ultra112 FPS88 FPS
    1440p
    low143 FPS119 FPS
    medium123 FPS115 FPS
    high99 FPS91 FPS
    ultra84 FPS71 FPS
    4K
    low81 FPS69 FPS
    medium74 FPS58 FPS
    high59 FPS46 FPS
    ultra46 FPS36 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-13400FN250
    1080p
    low545 FPS119 FPS
    medium464 FPS119 FPS
    high389 FPS119 FPS
    ultra356 FPS119 FPS
    1440p
    low458 FPS119 FPS
    medium403 FPS119 FPS
    high345 FPS119 FPS
    ultra301 FPS119 FPS
    4K
    low280 FPS119 FPS
    medium247 FPS119 FPS
    high231 FPS110 FPS
    ultra204 FPS84 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-13400FN250
    1080p
    low530 FPS119 FPS
    medium449 FPS119 FPS
    high415 FPS119 FPS
    ultra375 FPS119 FPS
    1440p
    low490 FPS119 FPS
    medium422 FPS119 FPS
    high382 FPS119 FPS
    ultra343 FPS119 FPS
    4K
    low393 FPS119 FPS
    medium331 FPS119 FPS
    high296 FPS119 FPS
    ultra246 FPS119 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-13400FN250
    1080p
    low626 FPS119 FPS
    medium626 FPS119 FPS
    high626 FPS119 FPS
    ultra626 FPS119 FPS
    1440p
    low626 FPS119 FPS
    medium626 FPS119 FPS
    high598 FPS119 FPS
    ultra521 FPS119 FPS
    4K
    low535 FPS119 FPS
    medium492 FPS119 FPS
    high439 FPS119 FPS
    ultra382 FPS119 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and N250

    Intel

    Core i5-13400F

    The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

    Intel

    N250

    The N250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,773 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the N250 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.8 GHz on the N250 — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the N250's 4,773 — a 135.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N250.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FN250
    Cores / Threads
    10 / 16+150%
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.6 GHz+21%
    3.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    20 MB (total)+233%
    6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
    L2 Cache
    1.25 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm
    Intel 7 nm
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
    PassMark
    25,029+424%
    4,773
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    16,211
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,407
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    11,408
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the N250 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FN250
    Socket
    LGA1700
    FCBGA1264
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (N250). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

    FeatureCore i5-13400FN250
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Gaming