
Core i5-13400F

Pentium 987
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium 987 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium 987 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium 987: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +483.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 1050.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1023 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.3% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
Pentium 987
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,487 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1023, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Pentium 987?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium 987 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Pentium 987
The Pentium 987 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,487 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Pentium 987 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium 987 — a 101.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Pentium 987 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Pentium 987's 1,487 — a 177.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 987.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+400% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+207% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+67% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+900% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 25,029+1583% | 1,487 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Pentium 987 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Pentium 987). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Pentium 987 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($196 vs $134), Pentium 987 was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 11.1 pts/$ for the Pentium 987 — making the Core i5-13400F the 168% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium 987 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $134-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+1050% | 11.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















