PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +701.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 939.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA775 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium E6300.

Trade-offs

❌
133.3% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$84 MSRP

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA775, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +701.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 939.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA775 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium E6300.

Why buy it

✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
133.3% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$84 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA775, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Pentium E6300?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 701.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2325.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 701.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 2325.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is 133.3% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it gives you a 701.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 939.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2009), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA775, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Pentium E6300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
1080p
low	171 FPS	26 FPS
medium	158 FPS	26 FPS
high	132 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	26 FPS
medium	123 FPS	26 FPS
high	99 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	26 FPS
medium	74 FPS	26 FPS
high	59 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	26 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Pentium E6300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
1080p
low	545 FPS	26 FPS
medium	464 FPS	26 FPS
high	389 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	26 FPS
medium	403 FPS	26 FPS
high	345 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	26 FPS
medium	247 FPS	26 FPS
high	231 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	26 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Pentium E6300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
1080p
low	530 FPS	26 FPS
medium	449 FPS	26 FPS
high	415 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	26 FPS
medium	422 FPS	26 FPS
high	382 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	26 FPS
medium	331 FPS	26 FPS
high	296 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	26 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Pentium E6300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
1080p
low	626 FPS	26 FPS
medium	626 FPS	26 FPS
high	626 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	26 FPS
medium	626 FPS	26 FPS
high	598 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	26 FPS
medium	492 FPS	26 FPS
high	439 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	26 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Pentium E6300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Pentium E6300

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Pentium E6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 184.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+400%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+64%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (total)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-84%	45 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	25,029+2325%	1,032
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
Socket	LGA1700	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+355%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Pentium E6300). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Pentium E6300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Pentium E6300 debuted at $84. On MSRP ($196 vs $84), the Pentium E6300 is $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Pentium E6300 — making the Core i5-13400F the 164.9% better value option.