Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 720

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 720

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 720 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 720 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 720: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +446.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Delivers 937.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • 50.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $196 MSRPvs$130 MSRP

Phenom II X3 720

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $66 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (980 vs 11,408).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Phenom II X3 720?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 446.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1064.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 1464.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 446.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1064.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 50.8% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $130 MSRP, and it still gives you a 446.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 937.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3, 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 3/3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 720 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Phenom II X3 720

The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Phenom II X3 720 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Phenom II X3 720's 1,600 — a 176% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 380, a 145.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 980 (168.4% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 720
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+233%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+64%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+233%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-84%
45 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark
25,029+1464%
1,600
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+533%
380
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+1064%
980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 720 — the Core i5-13400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Phenom II X3 720) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720).

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 720
Socket
LGA1700
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+1100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X3 720 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 720). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 720
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Phenom II X3 720 came in at $130. On launch pricing ($196 vs $130), Phenom II X3 720 was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X3 720 — making the Core i5-13400F the 164.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 720
MSRP
$196
$130-34%
Performance per Dollar
127.7+938%
12.3
Release Date
2023
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.