Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X3 P840

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 P840

3 Cores3 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2010

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +356.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of S1 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X3 P840.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Phenom II X3 P840 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.

Phenom II X3 P840

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,425 vs 25,029).
  • Older platform position on S1, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Phenom II X3 P840?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 356.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 465.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 356.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 465.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 356.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of S1, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 3/3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
1080p
low171 FPS111 FPS
medium158 FPS111 FPS
high132 FPS98 FPS
ultra112 FPS76 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS111 FPS
medium123 FPS102 FPS
high99 FPS79 FPS
ultra84 FPS61 FPS
4K
low81 FPS63 FPS
medium74 FPS52 FPS
high59 FPS40 FPS
ultra46 FPS31 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
1080p
low545 FPS111 FPS
medium464 FPS111 FPS
high389 FPS105 FPS
ultra356 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS111 FPS
medium403 FPS96 FPS
high345 FPS87 FPS
ultra301 FPS66 FPS
4K
low280 FPS76 FPS
medium247 FPS66 FPS
high231 FPS47 FPS
ultra204 FPS32 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
1080p
low530 FPS111 FPS
medium449 FPS111 FPS
high415 FPS111 FPS
ultra375 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS111 FPS
medium422 FPS111 FPS
high382 FPS111 FPS
ultra343 FPS111 FPS
4K
low393 FPS111 FPS
medium331 FPS111 FPS
high296 FPS111 FPS
ultra246 FPS111 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
1080p
low626 FPS111 FPS
medium626 FPS111 FPS
high626 FPS111 FPS
ultra626 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS111 FPS
medium626 FPS111 FPS
high598 FPS111 FPS
ultra521 FPS111 FPS
4K
low535 FPS111 FPS
medium492 FPS111 FPS
high439 FPS111 FPS
ultra382 FPS111 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Phenom II X3 P840

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Phenom II X3 P840

The Phenom II X3 P840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,425 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Phenom II X3 P840 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom II X3 P840 — a 83.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X3 P840 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Phenom II X3 P840's 4,425 — a 139.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+233%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+142%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.5 MB+20%
Process
Intel 7 nm-84%
45 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark
25,029+466%
4,425
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Phenom II X3 P840 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
Socket
LGA1700
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Phenom II X3 P840). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FPhenom II X3 P840
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming