Core i5-13400F vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2010

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+404.1%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

6 / 6

4,965

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +145.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,965 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM3, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +145.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,965 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM3, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 145.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 404.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 145.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 404.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 145.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3, 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/6. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
1080p
low	171 FPS	124 FPS
medium	158 FPS	124 FPS
high	132 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	124 FPS
medium	123 FPS	113 FPS
high	99 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	62 FPS
medium	74 FPS	56 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
1080p
low	545 FPS	124 FPS
medium	464 FPS	124 FPS
high	389 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	124 FPS
medium	403 FPS	124 FPS
high	345 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	124 FPS
medium	247 FPS	117 FPS
high	231 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	72 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
1080p
low	530 FPS	124 FPS
medium	449 FPS	124 FPS
high	415 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	124 FPS
medium	422 FPS	124 FPS
high	382 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	124 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	124 FPS
medium	331 FPS	124 FPS
high	296 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
1080p
low	626 FPS	124 FPS
medium	626 FPS	124 FPS
high	626 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	124 FPS
medium	626 FPS	124 FPS
high	598 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	124 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	124 FPS
medium	492 FPS	124 FPS
high	439 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,965 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.3 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)'s 4,965 — a 133.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+39%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+233%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-84%	45 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	25,029+404%	4,965
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Socket	LGA1700	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.