PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +87.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 44.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor 300.

Trade-offs

❌
139% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$82 MSRP
❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,264 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 88.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Processor 300

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +87.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 44.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor 300.

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
139% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$82 MSRP
❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,264 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 88.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Processor 300?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 87.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 244.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 87.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 244.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is 139.0% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it gives you a 87.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 44.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 88.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor 300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Processor 300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
1080p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	158 FPS	144 FPS
high	132 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	148 FPS
medium	123 FPS	120 FPS
high	99 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	59 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Processor 300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
1080p
low	545 FPS	177 FPS
medium	464 FPS	156 FPS
high	389 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	141 FPS
medium	403 FPS	122 FPS
high	345 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	103 FPS
medium	247 FPS	92 FPS
high	231 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	49 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Processor 300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
1080p
low	530 FPS	182 FPS
medium	449 FPS	182 FPS
high	415 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	182 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	182 FPS
medium	422 FPS	182 FPS
high	382 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	182 FPS
medium	331 FPS	182 FPS
high	296 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	168 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Processor 300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
1080p
low	626 FPS	182 FPS
medium	626 FPS	182 FPS
high	626 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	182 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	182 FPS
medium	626 FPS	182 FPS
high	598 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	182 FPS
medium	492 FPS	182 FPS
high	439 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	182 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Processor 300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Processor 300

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processor 300

The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Processor 300 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Processor 300's 7,264 — a 110% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+400%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+18%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+233%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029+245%	7,264
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Processor 300). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Processor 300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Processor 300 debuted at $82. On MSRP ($196 vs $82), the Processor 300 is $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 88.6 pts/$ for the Processor 300 — making the Core i5-13400F the 36.2% better value option.