Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +69.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7335U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7335U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 3 7335U

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (12,568 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 3 7335U?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 69.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 99.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 69.4% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 99.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 69.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low171 FPS165 FPS
medium158 FPS142 FPS
high132 FPS113 FPS
ultra112 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS142 FPS
medium123 FPS119 FPS
high99 FPS95 FPS
ultra84 FPS78 FPS
4K
low81 FPS76 FPS
medium74 FPS68 FPS
high59 FPS54 FPS
ultra46 FPS42 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low545 FPS254 FPS
medium464 FPS217 FPS
high389 FPS198 FPS
ultra356 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS219 FPS
medium403 FPS189 FPS
high345 FPS176 FPS
ultra301 FPS151 FPS
4K
low280 FPS170 FPS
medium247 FPS150 FPS
high231 FPS124 FPS
ultra204 FPS101 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low530 FPS314 FPS
medium449 FPS314 FPS
high415 FPS314 FPS
ultra375 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS314 FPS
medium422 FPS314 FPS
high382 FPS314 FPS
ultra343 FPS292 FPS
4K
low393 FPS314 FPS
medium331 FPS274 FPS
high296 FPS239 FPS
ultra246 FPS190 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low626 FPS314 FPS
medium626 FPS314 FPS
high626 FPS314 FPS
ultra626 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS314 FPS
medium626 FPS314 FPS
high598 FPS314 FPS
ultra521 FPS314 FPS
4K
low535 FPS314 FPS
medium492 FPS314 FPS
high439 FPS314 FPS
ultra382 FPS314 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7335U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 3 7335U's 12,568 — a 66.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+7%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
6 nm-14%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
25,029+99%
12,568
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 7335U). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 7335U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming