
Core i5-13400F

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 73.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.5% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,995 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,942 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G's 10,942 — a 78.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 5,995 (92% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,516, a 45.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 5,334 (72.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+400% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 25,029+129% | 10,942 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+170% | 5,995 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+59% | 1,516 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+114% | 5,334 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 6 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G came in at $149. On launch pricing ($196 vs $149), Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G — making the Core i5-13400F the 54% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $149-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+74% | 73.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














