
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 301 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 18,945 — a 27.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | — |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 25,029+32% | 18,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is $196 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













