
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 204.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600F
2025Why buy it
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 204.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,225 vs 25,029).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 5 5600F
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600F.
Why buy it
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 204.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 204.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,225 vs 25,029).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 5600F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 5600F

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 5 5600F
Ryzen 5 5600F
The Ryzen 5 5600F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,225 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600F — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 5600F's 20,225 — a 21.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600F.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029+24% | 20,225 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600F) — the Ryzen 5 5600F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 5600F targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600F debuted at $99. On MSRP ($196 vs $99), the Ryzen 5 5600F is $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 204.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600F — making the Ryzen 5 5600F the 46.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $99-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | 204.3+60% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












