
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (7-core), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,126 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 5 5600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5600H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (7-core), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,126 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 5600H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 166 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 347 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 5600H

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H
The Ryzen 5 5600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,533 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600H — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600H uses Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 5600H's 16,533 — a 40.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 10,126 (46.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,764, a 30.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,678 (39.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+51% | 16,533 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+60% | 10,126 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+36% | 1,764 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+49% | 7,678 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600H uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4266 on the Ryzen 5 5600H — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen 5 5600H) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600H). The Ryzen 5 5600H includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (7-core)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 5600H targets Gaming Laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 5 5600H rivals Core i5-11400H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (7-core) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming Laptops |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












