PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+15.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7645HX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7645HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7645HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.8% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 16,211).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 5 7645HX

2023

Why buy it

✅+15.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7645HX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.8% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7645HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,985 vs 16,211).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 7645HX?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 7645HX is ahead with a 20.8% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 15.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 5 7645HX also has the bigger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 15.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 15.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7645HX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.8% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7645HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
1080p
low	171 FPS	272 FPS
medium	158 FPS	249 FPS
high	132 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	182 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	229 FPS
medium	123 FPS	190 FPS
high	99 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	160 FPS
medium	74 FPS	133 FPS
high	59 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 7645HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
1080p
low	545 FPS	638 FPS
medium	464 FPS	515 FPS
high	389 FPS	430 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	546 FPS
medium	403 FPS	459 FPS
high	345 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	335 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	347 FPS
medium	247 FPS	294 FPS
high	231 FPS	273 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	236 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 7645HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
1080p
low	530 FPS	652 FPS
medium	449 FPS	652 FPS
high	415 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	590 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	652 FPS
medium	422 FPS	598 FPS
high	382 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	513 FPS
medium	331 FPS	433 FPS
high	296 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	306 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 7645HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
1080p
low	626 FPS	652 FPS
medium	626 FPS	652 FPS
high	626 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	652 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	652 FPS
medium	626 FPS	652 FPS
high	598 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	570 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	586 FPS
medium	492 FPS	525 FPS
high	439 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	405 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 7645HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 7645HX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 7645HX

The Ryzen 5 7645HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,097 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7645HX — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7645HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 7645HX's 26,097 — a 4.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7645HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 13,985 (14.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,588, a 7.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7645HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 11,717 (2.7% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7645HX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7645HX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	25,029	26,097+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+16%	13,985
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,588+8%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	11,717+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7645HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) — the Ryzen 5 7645HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Ryzen 5 7645HX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 7645HX
Socket	LGA1700	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7645HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 7645HX). The Ryzen 5 7645HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 7645HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 5 7645HX rivals Core i5-13500HX.