PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 8640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,675 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 5 8640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,675 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 8640U?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 51.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 23.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 51.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 8640U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
1080p
low	171 FPS	261 FPS
medium	158 FPS	237 FPS
high	132 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	230 FPS
medium	123 FPS	190 FPS
high	99 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	159 FPS
medium	74 FPS	133 FPS
high	59 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 8640U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
1080p
low	545 FPS	371 FPS
medium	464 FPS	309 FPS
high	389 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	313 FPS
medium	403 FPS	270 FPS
high	345 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	207 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	234 FPS
medium	247 FPS	206 FPS
high	231 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	161 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 8640U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
1080p
low	530 FPS	507 FPS
medium	449 FPS	507 FPS
high	415 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	507 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	507 FPS
medium	422 FPS	507 FPS
high	382 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	493 FPS
medium	331 FPS	435 FPS
high	296 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	308 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 8640U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
1080p
low	626 FPS	507 FPS
medium	626 FPS	507 FPS
high	626 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	507 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	507 FPS
medium	626 FPS	507 FPS
high	598 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	507 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	507 FPS
medium	492 FPS	501 FPS
high	439 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	380 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 8640U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 8640U

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 21% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 10,675 (41.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,519, a 4.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,308 (10.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029+23%	20,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+52%	10,675
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,519+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+11%	10,308

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 8640U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Ryzen 5 8640U).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 8640U
Socket	LGA1700	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 8640U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.