PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

Trade-offs

❌
30.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,210 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

Why buy it

✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
30.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,210 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 230?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 9.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 58.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and 27.0% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 58.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core i5-13400F is 30.7% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 230 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 9.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 230 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low	171 FPS	265 FPS
medium	158 FPS	240 FPS
high	132 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	232 FPS
medium	123 FPS	191 FPS
high	99 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	161 FPS
medium	74 FPS	134 FPS
high	59 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low	545 FPS	390 FPS
medium	464 FPS	323 FPS
high	389 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	328 FPS
medium	403 FPS	282 FPS
high	345 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	220 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	246 FPS
medium	247 FPS	216 FPS
high	231 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low	530 FPS	493 FPS
medium	449 FPS	493 FPS
high	415 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	493 FPS
medium	422 FPS	493 FPS
high	382 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	439 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	493 FPS
medium	331 FPS	434 FPS
high	296 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 230

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
1080p
low	626 FPS	493 FPS
medium	626 FPS	493 FPS
high	626 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	493 FPS
medium	626 FPS	493 FPS
high	598 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	493 FPS
medium	492 FPS	493 FPS
high	439 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	381 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,702 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 230's 19,702 — a 23.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,320, a 3.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,210 (45.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6 MB+380%
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029+27%	19,702
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+4%	2,320
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+58%	7,210

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Socket FP7 (Ryzen 5 PRO 230).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Socket	LGA1700	FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 5 PRO 230). The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 760M
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 debuted at $150. On MSRP ($196 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 131.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 230 the 2.8% better value option.