PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅Delivers 118.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 58.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,504 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅Delivers 118.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 58.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,504 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 977.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 37.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 977.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $115 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $311 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 118.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 58.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
1080p
low	171 FPS	184 FPS
medium	158 FPS	154 FPS
high	132 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	157 FPS
medium	123 FPS	128 FPS
high	99 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	84 FPS
medium	74 FPS	75 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
1080p
low	545 FPS	360 FPS
medium	464 FPS	303 FPS
high	389 FPS	273 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	319 FPS
medium	403 FPS	276 FPS
high	345 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	248 FPS
medium	247 FPS	218 FPS
high	231 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	172 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
1080p
low	530 FPS	454 FPS
medium	449 FPS	454 FPS
high	415 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	416 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	454 FPS
medium	422 FPS	412 FPS
high	382 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	341 FPS
medium	331 FPS	287 FPS
high	296 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	193 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
1080p
low	626 FPS	454 FPS
medium	626 FPS	454 FPS
high	626 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	454 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	454 FPS
medium	626 FPS	454 FPS
high	598 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	454 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	454 FPS
medium	492 FPS	433 FPS
high	439 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,155 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE's 18,155 — a 31.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 1,504 (166% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,900, a 23.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 6,700 (52% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+5%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cezanne (2021−2025)
PassMark	25,029+38%	18,155
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+978%	1,504
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+27%	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+70%	6,700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AM4 (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE). The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE debuted at $311. On MSRP ($196 vs $311), the Core i5-13400F is $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 58.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE — making the Core i5-13400F the 74.5% better value option.