
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,315 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,315 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,315 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U's 18,315 — a 31% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029+37% | 18,315 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













