PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 250.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,551 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 250.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,551 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 5825C?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.0% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data, 69.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 71.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 11 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 69.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $204 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 250.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5825C Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
1080p
low	171 FPS	173 FPS
medium	158 FPS	149 FPS
high	132 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	148 FPS
medium	123 FPS	125 FPS
high	99 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	82 FPS
medium	74 FPS	74 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5825C

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
1080p
low	545 FPS	236 FPS
medium	464 FPS	201 FPS
high	389 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	156 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	203 FPS
medium	403 FPS	179 FPS
high	345 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	140 FPS
medium	247 FPS	127 FPS
high	231 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	106 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5825C

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
1080p
low	530 FPS	364 FPS
medium	449 FPS	364 FPS
high	415 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	364 FPS
medium	422 FPS	364 FPS
high	382 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	324 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	364 FPS
medium	331 FPS	316 FPS
high	296 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	219 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5825C

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
1080p
low	626 FPS	364 FPS
medium	626 FPS	364 FPS
high	626 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	364 FPS
medium	626 FPS	364 FPS
high	598 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	364 FPS
medium	492 FPS	364 FPS
high	439 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	345 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5825C

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 5825C

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825C offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 52.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 9,551 (51.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,961, a 20.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,145 (46% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark	25,029+72%	14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+70%	9,551
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+23%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+60%	7,145

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Socket	LGA1700	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+150%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5825C debuted at $400. On MSRP ($196 vs $400), the Core i5-13400F is $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Core i5-13400F the 111.3% better value option.