Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 6800U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 6800U

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Costs $164 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
  • Delivers 123.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 57.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 6800U.

Trade-offs

  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 6800U

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,741 vs 16,211).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 6800U?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 38.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 21.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.9% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 38.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $164 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $360 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 123.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 57.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
1080p
low171 FPS166 FPS
medium158 FPS147 FPS
high132 FPS120 FPS
ultra112 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS142 FPS
medium123 FPS121 FPS
high99 FPS98 FPS
ultra84 FPS82 FPS
4K
low81 FPS79 FPS
medium74 FPS72 FPS
high59 FPS58 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
1080p
low545 FPS428 FPS
medium464 FPS362 FPS
high389 FPS316 FPS
ultra356 FPS281 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS368 FPS
medium403 FPS321 FPS
high345 FPS286 FPS
ultra301 FPS245 FPS
4K
low280 FPS253 FPS
medium247 FPS227 FPS
high231 FPS214 FPS
ultra204 FPS185 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
1080p
low530 FPS515 FPS
medium449 FPS515 FPS
high415 FPS485 FPS
ultra375 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS515 FPS
medium422 FPS510 FPS
high382 FPS437 FPS
ultra343 FPS355 FPS
4K
low393 FPS432 FPS
medium331 FPS368 FPS
high296 FPS323 FPS
ultra246 FPS262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
1080p
low626 FPS515 FPS
medium626 FPS515 FPS
high626 FPS515 FPS
ultra626 FPS515 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS515 FPS
medium626 FPS515 FPS
high598 FPS515 FPS
ultra521 FPS504 FPS
4K
low535 FPS515 FPS
medium492 FPS483 FPS
high439 FPS431 FPS
ultra382 FPS372 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 6800U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 7 6800U

The Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,619 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800U uses Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 6800U's 20,619 — a 19.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 11,741 (32% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,713, a 33.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,397 (42.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800U.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
6 nm-14%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
25,029+21%
20,619
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211+38%
11,741
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+41%
1,713
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+54%
7,397
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 6800U).

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+200%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800U). The Ryzen 7 6800U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 6800U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 7 6800U rivals Core i7-1255U.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
Gaming
Productivity
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 6800U debuted at $360. On MSRP ($196 vs $360), the Core i5-13400F is $164 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 57.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 6800U — making the Core i5-13400F the 76.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 7 6800U
MSRP
$196-46%
$360
Performance per Dollar
127.7+123%
57.3
Release Date
2023
2022