Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7435HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7435HS.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7435HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 7 7435HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 7435HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7435HS.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7435HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 7435HS?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.3% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 8.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7435HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
1080p
low	171 FPS	166 FPS
medium	158 FPS	145 FPS
high	132 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	141 FPS
medium	123 FPS	121 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	78 FPS
medium	74 FPS	72 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7435HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
1080p
low	545 FPS	464 FPS
medium	464 FPS	391 FPS
high	389 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	297 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	397 FPS
medium	403 FPS	346 FPS
high	345 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	274 FPS
medium	247 FPS	246 FPS
high	231 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	195 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7435HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
1080p
low	530 FPS	578 FPS
medium	449 FPS	495 FPS
high	415 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	524 FPS
medium	422 FPS	440 FPS
high	382 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	333 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	394 FPS
medium	331 FPS	325 FPS
high	296 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	230 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7435HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
1080p
low	626 FPS	578 FPS
medium	626 FPS	578 FPS
high	626 FPS	578 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	578 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	578 FPS
medium	626 FPS	578 FPS
high	598 FPS	568 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	495 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	510 FPS
medium	492 FPS	469 FPS
high	439 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7435HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 7435HS

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 7435HS

The Ryzen 7 7435HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,101 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7435HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7435HS — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 7435HS's 23,101 — a 8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7435HS.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4 MB+220%
Process	Intel 7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rembrandt R (2025)
PassMark	25,029+8%	23,101
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7435HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP7r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7435HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.