
Core i5-13400F

Ryzen 7 7700
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 104.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 34,392).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2CU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 104.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7700 better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 7 7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 7 7700
The Ryzen 7 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,392 points. Launch price was $339.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 7700's 34,392 — a 31.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7700. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 34,392+37% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7700 — the Ryzen 7 7700 supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7700) — the Ryzen 7 7700 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7700 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700). The Ryzen 7 7700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2CU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 7700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (2CU) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen 7 7700 came in at $329. On launch pricing ($196 vs $329), Core i5-13400F was $133 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 104.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7700 — making the Core i5-13400F the 19.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+22% | 104.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














