PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.1% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data, 70.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 47.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 10 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 70.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $133 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 147.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	171 FPS	223 FPS
medium	158 FPS	191 FPS
high	132 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	183 FPS
medium	123 FPS	150 FPS
high	99 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	71 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	59 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	545 FPS	346 FPS
medium	464 FPS	305 FPS
high	389 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	316 FPS
medium	403 FPS	285 FPS
high	345 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	232 FPS
medium	247 FPS	213 FPS
high	231 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	530 FPS	424 FPS
medium	449 FPS	424 FPS
high	415 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	424 FPS
medium	422 FPS	424 FPS
high	382 FPS	405 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	340 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	391 FPS
medium	331 FPS	323 FPS
high	296 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	626 FPS	424 FPS
medium	626 FPS	424 FPS
high	626 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	424 FPS
medium	626 FPS	424 FPS
high	598 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	424 FPS
medium	492 FPS	424 FPS
high	439 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	359 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 38.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 9,500 (52.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,255, a 62.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 6,243 (58.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+12%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	25,029+48%	16,959
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+71%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+92%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+83%	6,243

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($196 vs $329), the Core i5-13400F is $133 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Core i5-13400F the 85% better value option.