PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

2020

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,814 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,814 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 26.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 23.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 26.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $113 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 65.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
1080p
low	171 FPS	215 FPS
medium	158 FPS	173 FPS
high	132 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	185 FPS
medium	123 FPS	147 FPS
high	99 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	89 FPS
medium	74 FPS	77 FPS
high	59 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
1080p
low	545 FPS	381 FPS
medium	464 FPS	317 FPS
high	389 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	330 FPS
medium	403 FPS	285 FPS
high	345 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	265 FPS
medium	247 FPS	238 FPS
high	231 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	186 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
1080p
low	530 FPS	506 FPS
medium	449 FPS	506 FPS
high	415 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	506 FPS
medium	422 FPS	506 FPS
high	382 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	408 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	439 FPS
medium	331 FPS	374 FPS
high	296 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	266 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
1080p
low	626 FPS	506 FPS
medium	626 FPS	506 FPS
high	626 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	506 FPS
medium	626 FPS	506 FPS
high	598 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	506 FPS
medium	492 FPS	493 FPS
high	439 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	368 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 21.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 12,814 (23.4% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,627, a 38.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,556 (40.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+5%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	25,029+24%	20,227
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+27%	12,814
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+48%	1,627
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+51%	7,556

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G debuted at $309. On MSRP ($196 vs $309), the Core i5-13400F is $113 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — making the Core i5-13400F the 64.4% better value option.