
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,084 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,084 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 20,084 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z's 20,084 — a 21.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.75 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4 MB+220% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,029+25% | 20,084 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












