
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 5 340.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 5 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen AI 5 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 5 340.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen AI 5 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen AI 5 340

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen AI 5 340
Ryzen AI 5 340
The Ryzen AI 5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,776 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 340 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 340 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen AI 5 340's 19,776 — a 23.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 340.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029+27% | 19,776 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 340). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 5 340 is $196 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












