PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $404 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.5% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $404 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.5% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 39.5% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data, 72.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 39.5% more average FPS across 8 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better fit. You are getting 72.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is 206.1% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 39.5% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 77.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	171 FPS	286 FPS
medium	158 FPS	253 FPS
high	132 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	185 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	266 FPS
medium	123 FPS	211 FPS
high	99 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	184 FPS
medium	74 FPS	147 FPS
high	59 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	97 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	545 FPS	778 FPS
medium	464 FPS	656 FPS
high	389 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	654 FPS
medium	403 FPS	572 FPS
high	345 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	368 FPS
medium	247 FPS	326 FPS
high	231 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	264 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	530 FPS	1021 FPS
medium	449 FPS	783 FPS
high	415 FPS	685 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	818 FPS
medium	422 FPS	635 FPS
high	382 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	565 FPS
medium	331 FPS	460 FPS
high	296 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	342 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	626 FPS	1079 FPS
medium	626 FPS	1015 FPS
high	626 FPS	912 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	811 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	895 FPS
medium	626 FPS	788 FPS
high	598 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	658 FPS
medium	492 FPS	582 FPS
high	439 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 53.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+220%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	25,029	43,174+72%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	8000+159900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+157286300%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($196 vs $600), the Core i5-13400F is $404 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Core i5-13400F the 55.8% better value option.