Core i5-13400F
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $404 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 53.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 43,174+72% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 came in at $600. On launch pricing ($196 vs $600), Core i5-13400F was $404 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Core i5-13400F the 55.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-67% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+77% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400F and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
