Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Embedded V2A46

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+400.7%

4,999

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +154.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +154.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V2A46 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,999 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen Embedded V2A46?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 154.0% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 400.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 154.0% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 400.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 154.0% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Embedded V2A46 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
1080p
low	171 FPS	125 FPS
medium	158 FPS	125 FPS
high	132 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	125 FPS
medium	123 FPS	113 FPS
high	99 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	66 FPS
medium	74 FPS	56 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Embedded V2A46

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
1080p
low	545 FPS	125 FPS
medium	464 FPS	125 FPS
high	389 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	125 FPS
medium	403 FPS	125 FPS
high	345 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	125 FPS
medium	247 FPS	125 FPS
high	231 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Embedded V2A46

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
1080p
low	530 FPS	125 FPS
medium	449 FPS	125 FPS
high	415 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	125 FPS
medium	422 FPS	125 FPS
high	382 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	125 FPS
medium	331 FPS	125 FPS
high	296 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	125 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Embedded V2A46

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
1080p
low	626 FPS	125 FPS
medium	626 FPS	125 FPS
high	626 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	125 FPS
medium	626 FPS	125 FPS
high	598 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	125 FPS
medium	492 FPS	125 FPS
high	439 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	125 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Embedded V2A46

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded V2A46

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Embedded V2A46

The Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,999 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Embedded V2A46's 4,999 — a 133.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2A46.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+44%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	25,029+401%	4,999
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Socket	LGA1700	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2A46). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Embedded V2A46
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded V2A46 is $196 cheaper.