
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 21.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+21% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,029+24% | 20,203 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












